you do is swab the inside of the mouth and mail back.
a savings of $20.00)
This information comes from Andrew Lancaster about the Satterfield/Sutterfield DNA project.
Kit 151902. Our participant can be traced back to Peter Moore Sutterfield/Satterfield of Searcy Co. Arkansas. This family normally uses the spelling "Sutterfield".
Peter Moore Sutterfield/Satterfield first appears at his marriage to Mary Rogers on Jul 26, 1801, Laurens Co., S.C. Their first four children were born in
There are 5 generation steps back from our participant to Peter Moore Sutterfield.
Kit 125916. Our participant can be traced back to Robert Satterfield who had moved from Newberry,
This family used both the Satterfield and Sutterfield spellings. From a legal document of 1853 written by James Samuel Satterfield of Union Co. (sometimes referred to as James D Satterfield in genealogies) we know that his parents were Robert and Catherine, and that Robert had been a revolutionary soldier of North Carolina, and that he had moved from Newberry Co. to Union Co. They had married in 1774, and lived in Newberry for only about 1 year. It seems likely they came from Pendleton district where a Robert appears on the 1790 and 1800 census. In 1810 they were in Edgefield district, and in 1820 and 1825 they appear to have been in Greenville district.
As with other Satterfields associated with Pendleton in this period there are theories that Robert is the son of one James W Satterfield, and in other
words a brother to James D Satterfield, Thomas Wilson Satterfield, and Jeremiah Satterfield, discussed above.
There are 6 generation steps back from our participant to Robert Satterfield.
These lines do not match the above kits OR each other.
Satterfield Kits 130288, 120489, 153087
There is one generational step between 130288 and 120489. The great grandfather, three generational steps back, of both 130288 and 153087, and
their most recent common ancestor, was Jesse Columbus Satterfield, born about 1846 in Ozark Co. Missouri, and previously thought to be James
Columbus. It appears possible that his father was also named Jesse, who may have come from Warren Co. Kentucky. The DNA signature is very unusual, and therefore matches with some Wilson and Anderson families may very well be quite significant.
Proposed descendants of Jeremiah Satterfield of Pendleton, who married Elizabeth Brashears about 1797.
It was strongly believed that the following kits would be members of the same family as lived in the Carolinas, descending from Jeremiah Satterfield.
Jeremiah seems to have even in lived in Pendleton, around 1800, before moving to
different R1b lines, and not in the same male line shared by some Satterfield and Satterthwaite families, and not matching either each other or any other Satterfield lines tested so far.
See above in the E3b section for more about the Pendleton Satterfields. Thomas Wilson Satterfield, in E3b Satterfield family 1, should by this theory have been Jeremiah's brother. These lines may well have been closely related to each other and to the other Pendleton lines, but the male line of most Pendleton descendents is quite distinct in our time.
There can be many very straightforward reasons for this, including informal adoption, which happened frequently in colonial times. Might Jeremiah have
adopted his children?
Saterfield Kit 100925.
Our participant has 4 generational steps back to Peter Satterfield, said to be a son of Jeremiah.
This is an R1b haplotype. No very close matches have been found outside the project either yet.
Satterfield Kit 151849 is also traced by genealogists back to Jeremiah Satterfield of Pendleton.
Our participant has 3 generational steps back to Hezekiah Satterfield, said to be a son of Jeremiah.
This is an R1b haplotype. The closest matches are to families with the surnames Roberts, Allen and Runyon/Runyan/Runion.
Satterfield Kit 152047 is yet a third line traced by genealogists back to Jeremiah Satterfield of Pendleton!
Our participant has 3 generational steps back to Basil Satterfield, said to be a son of Jeremiah.
This is an R1b haplotype. The closest matches are to families with the surname Rogers.
Other helpful links (provided by computer historian, Jack Satterfield):
http://users.skynet.be/lancaster/Lancaster%20surnames.htm - some remarks upon surnames related to Lancaster
http://users.skynet.be/lancaster/Lancaster%20and%20Satterthwaite.html - the mysterious Lancaster-Satterfield-Satterthwaite connection
http://users.skynet.be/lancaster/Lancaster%20Index.html - a quick index to web pages by Andrew Lancaster, concerning the genealogy of the Lancaster surname, and related surnames
http://users.skynet.be/lancaster/Satterthwaite.html - Satterthwaite, was once part of Hawkshead parish
http://www.wirksworth.org.uk/frontpag.htm - look for INCE's Pedigrees 1600-1860
http://www.familytreesearcher.com/genealogy_software.htm - look for PAF 5.2 version free download